Maxon Developers Maxon Developers
    • Documentation
      • Cinema 4D Python API
      • Cinema 4D C++ API
      • Cineware API
      • ZBrush GoZ API
      • Code Examples on Github
    • Forum
    • Downloads
    • Support
      • Support Procedures
      • Registered Developer Program
      • Plugin IDs
      • Contact Us
    • Categories
      • Overview
      • News & Information
      • Cinema 4D SDK Support
      • Cineware SDK Support
      • ZBrush 4D SDK Support
      • Bugs
      • General Talk
    • Unread
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Users
    • Login

    Still can't get a 64bit version compiled

    SDK Help
    0
    42
    35.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • H
      Helper
      last edited by

      THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

      On 16/05/2007 at 06:27, xxxxxxxx wrote:

      oh sh**. Thanks, I think I have also chosen 32-bit only back then. Argh..ok, I try a reinstallation. 🙂 Thanks so far!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • H
        Helper
        last edited by

        THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

        On 16/05/2007 at 07:08, xxxxxxxx wrote:

        Even on the 64-bit systems you have to be sure to select 64-bit for the install - at least I had this with VS2003. Maybe VS2005 now installs default for the target install system (?).

        Good luck, Samir! 🙂

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H
          Helper
          last edited by

          THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

          On 16/05/2007 at 07:09, xxxxxxxx wrote:

          hmm, when I reinstall, I don´t get an option for 64-Bit in my express installation. Was it the Visual C++ express installation where this happened or is it the platform SDK that you mean?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • H
            Helper
            last edited by

            THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

            On 16/05/2007 at 07:12, xxxxxxxx wrote:

            Howdy,

            AH! The "Express" version doesn't have the 64bit option. You need at least the "Standard" version. 😞

            Adios,
            Cactus Dan

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • H
              Helper
              last edited by

              THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

              On 16/05/2007 at 07:37, xxxxxxxx wrote:

              As Cactus Dan says. :E

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • H
                Helper
                last edited by

                THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

                On 16/05/2007 at 07:42, xxxxxxxx wrote:

                no problem robert, I was too lazy in the past to buy the standard version. Now that´s a good reason to finally do so. 😄 thx!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • H
                  Helper
                  last edited by

                  THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

                  On 16/05/2007 at 07:47, xxxxxxxx wrote:

                  Howdy,

                  There was an upgrade from MSVC++.net 2003 to MSVC++ 2005 Standard that saved me some money on it. 😉

                  You may also have some sort of upgrade option.

                  Adios,
                  Cactus Dan

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • H
                    Helper
                    last edited by

                    THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

                    On 16/05/2007 at 07:54, xxxxxxxx wrote:

                    thanks for the hint. I´ll be checking on this. 🙂

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • H
                      Helper
                      last edited by

                      THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

                      On 12/06/2007 at 10:53, xxxxxxxx wrote:

                      Ok, now got my Standard installed (woosh, 5 fu*** CDs and a Service Pack update of 500 MB. Sigh, I miss the good ol C64 days. 🙂

                      Anyway, it now works to get that compiler to do what it needs. But I get a C4311 error in the TreeView Function GetId()

                      The migration docs say:
                      "Watch out for type cast warnings. E.g. the line LONG converted_ptr = (LONG)&data; will result in a warning warning C4311: 'type cast' : pointer truncation from 'BaseContainer *' to 'LONG'.. You need to change this code to VLONG converted_ptr = (VLONG)&data;."

                      And I am sure that I changed the function in my code correctly. Here it is:

                      virtual VLONG GetId(void *root, void *userdata, void *obj)  
                      {  
                           return (VLONG)obj;  
                      }
                      

                      But I still get the error? The activeobject sdk example uses it in the same way.

                      Anybody a clue why it´s not working?

                      Thanks!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • H
                        Helper
                        last edited by

                        THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

                        On 12/06/2007 at 10:59, xxxxxxxx wrote:

                        That's odd. Here's how I do it - note no typecasting to VLONG though:

                        #ifdef WIN64  
                        //*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*  
                        VLONG GetId(void* root, void* userdata, void* obj)  
                        //*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*  
                        {  
                             return ((RuntimeItem* )obj)->GetID();  
                        }  
                        #else
                        
                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • H
                          Helper
                          last edited by

                          THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

                          On 12/06/2007 at 11:12, xxxxxxxx wrote:

                          Howdy,

                          Hmmmm, that is odd because that is exactly the same as the SDK example.

                          Did the SDK project compile fine?

                          Adios,
                          Cactus Dan

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • H
                            Helper
                            last edited by

                            THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

                            On 12/06/2007 at 11:15, xxxxxxxx wrote:

                            Hmm, maybe your LONG value will be casted automatically to VLONG at occurance. As my object has no ID value (cannot simply add it due to stability reasons unfortunately) so I cannot use it.

                            But as I said, the activeobject example also uses a direct cast of the pointer and it works for me in a R10 32-bit compile. 😕

                            @Cactus: Will try a sdk compile.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • H
                              Helper
                              last edited by

                              THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

                              On 12/06/2007 at 11:22, xxxxxxxx wrote:

                              yep, compiles just fine. Hmm, strange. Then it must be something in my code, but what could that be in such a small and straight function? It´s an old implementation, did anything change over time in the treeview handling?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • H
                                Helper
                                last edited by

                                THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

                                On 12/06/2007 at 11:27, xxxxxxxx wrote:

                                ok, I simply got rid of the plugin and tried a compile, but now I also get 2001 and 2019 errors. I checked the installation but there was no 64-bit option. Darn, don´t tell me I missed it, I specifically kept an eye on this option during installation and wondered why it didn´t come up, but thought it may come later.

                                At which point does the installer ask for it?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • H
                                  Helper
                                  last edited by

                                  THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

                                  On 12/06/2007 at 11:34, xxxxxxxx wrote:

                                  Howdy,

                                  Yes, I missed the insallation of the 64 bit, too, and had to go back and reinstall it. :o(

                                  If I remember correctly, it was an option that you had to select on one of the pages in the installer window.

                                  Adios,
                                  Cactus Dan

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • H
                                    Helper
                                    last edited by

                                    THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

                                    On 13/06/2007 at 04:51, xxxxxxxx wrote:

                                    Argh, what do I need to deinstall to get to that selection window? When I only deinstall the standard edition, then at reinstalling I don´t get any chance to select anything. It simply reinstalls Visual C++ (well, I can choose if I want to also install Visual C# etc. but not the selection pages with that nice icons that I had in the first installation process.

                                    thx

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • H
                                      Helper
                                      last edited by

                                      THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

                                      On 13/06/2007 at 05:04, xxxxxxxx wrote:

                                      In vs 2005 pro you don't need to uninstall. Just put the installation dvd and select something like "add components". You will then come to an explorer-like selection tree where you have to check the appr. c++ language option (s.th. with "64bit"). don't know, if this behaviour is different in standard version.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • H
                                        Helper
                                        last edited by

                                        THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

                                        On 13/06/2007 at 05:11, xxxxxxxx wrote:

                                        hmm, I only have the standard edition here and here it doesn´t work that way. 😕 And yes, that selection tree is exactly what I am looking for! I got it in my first installation routine but now I don´t get it on my screen, neither with adding components nor with a complete reinstallation.

                                        I have 6 CDs here, first 2 CDs for installing Visual Studio, 3 CDs for the MSDN Lib and 1 CD for NET Framework SDK (x64).

                                        Is it the same in the pro version?

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • H
                                          Helper
                                          last edited by

                                          THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

                                          On 13/06/2007 at 05:25, xxxxxxxx wrote:

                                          here is a screen of what I get when I have it installed and put the CD in.

                                          - Adding/removing Features
                                          - Repair/reinstall
                                          - Deinstall

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • H
                                            Helper
                                            last edited by

                                            THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

                                            On 13/06/2007 at 05:38, xxxxxxxx wrote:

                                            Ah and none of these options will bring me to a selection tree. 😕

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post