Still can't get a 64bit version compiled

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 16/05/2007 at 07:47, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Howdy,

There was an upgrade from MSVC++.net 2003 to MSVC++ 2005 Standard that saved me some money on it.

You may also have some sort of upgrade option.

Adios,
Cactus Dan

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 16/05/2007 at 07:54, xxxxxxxx wrote:

thanks for the hint. I´ll be checking on this.

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 12/06/2007 at 10:53, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Ok, now got my Standard installed (woosh, 5 fu*** CDs and a Service Pack update of 500 MB. Sigh, I miss the good ol C64 days.

Anyway, it now works to get that compiler to do what it needs. But I get a C4311 error in the TreeView Function GetId()

The migration docs say:
"Watch out for type cast warnings. E.g. the line LONG converted_ptr = (LONG)&data; will result in a warning warning C4311: 'type cast' : pointer truncation from 'BaseContainer *' to 'LONG'.. You need to change this code to VLONG converted_ptr = (VLONG)&data;."

And I am sure that I changed the function in my code correctly. Here it is:

virtual VLONG GetId(void *root, void *userdata, void *obj)  
{  
     return (VLONG)obj;  
}

But I still get the error? The activeobject sdk example uses it in the same way.

Anybody a clue why it´s not working?

Thanks!

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 12/06/2007 at 10:59, xxxxxxxx wrote:

That's odd. Here's how I do it - note no typecasting to VLONG though:

#ifdef WIN64  
//*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*  
VLONG GetId(void* root, void* userdata, void* obj)  
//*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*  
{  
     return ((RuntimeItem* )obj)->GetID();  
}  
#else

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 12/06/2007 at 11:12, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Howdy,

Hmmmm, that is odd because that is exactly the same as the SDK example.

Did the SDK project compile fine?

Adios,
Cactus Dan

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 12/06/2007 at 11:15, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Hmm, maybe your LONG value will be casted automatically to VLONG at occurance. As my object has no ID value (cannot simply add it due to stability reasons unfortunately) so I cannot use it.

But as I said, the activeobject example also uses a direct cast of the pointer and it works for me in a R10 32-bit compile.

@Cactus: Will try a sdk compile.

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 12/06/2007 at 11:22, xxxxxxxx wrote:

yep, compiles just fine. Hmm, strange. Then it must be something in my code, but what could that be in such a small and straight function? It´s an old implementation, did anything change over time in the treeview handling?

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 12/06/2007 at 11:27, xxxxxxxx wrote:

ok, I simply got rid of the plugin and tried a compile, but now I also get 2001 and 2019 errors. I checked the installation but there was no 64-bit option. Darn, don´t tell me I missed it, I specifically kept an eye on this option during installation and wondered why it didn´t come up, but thought it may come later.

At which point does the installer ask for it?

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 12/06/2007 at 11:34, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Howdy,

Yes, I missed the insallation of the 64 bit, too, and had to go back and reinstall it. :o(

If I remember correctly, it was an option that you had to select on one of the pages in the installer window.

Adios,
Cactus Dan

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 13/06/2007 at 04:51, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Argh, what do I need to deinstall to get to that selection window? When I only deinstall the standard edition, then at reinstalling I don´t get any chance to select anything. It simply reinstalls Visual C++ (well, I can choose if I want to also install Visual C# etc. but not the selection pages with that nice icons that I had in the first installation process.

thx

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 13/06/2007 at 05:04, xxxxxxxx wrote:

In vs 2005 pro you don't need to uninstall. Just put the installation dvd and select something like "add components". You will then come to an explorer-like selection tree where you have to check the appr. c++ language option (s.th. with "64bit"). don't know, if this behaviour is different in standard version.

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 13/06/2007 at 05:11, xxxxxxxx wrote:

hmm, I only have the standard edition here and here it doesn´t work that way. And yes, that selection tree is exactly what I am looking for! I got it in my first installation routine but now I don´t get it on my screen, neither with adding components nor with a complete reinstallation.

I have 6 CDs here, first 2 CDs for installing Visual Studio, 3 CDs for the MSDN Lib and 1 CD for NET Framework SDK (x64).

Is it the same in the pro version?

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 13/06/2007 at 05:25, xxxxxxxx wrote:

here is a screen of what I get when I have it installed and put the CD in.

- Adding/removing Features
- Repair/reinstall
- Deinstall

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 13/06/2007 at 05:38, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Ah and none of these options will bring me to a selection tree.

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 13/06/2007 at 05:48, xxxxxxxx wrote:

The "Features hinzufügen oder entfernen" doesn't work? Don't know, whether the standard version will bring up a selection tree, but something should happen, where you can switch on/off the features!?

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 13/06/2007 at 06:02, xxxxxxxx wrote:

yep, I see another screen with some options. But all checkboxes. See the image. But nothing that allows me to choose specific features.

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 13/06/2007 at 06:32, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Anybody from MAXON? What makes me crazy is, that I can successfully compile a 64-Bit version of the Cinema 4D SDK! So it should also be possible to compile my version without problems I assume.

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 13/06/2007 at 06:34, xxxxxxxx wrote:

I have to check this for myself but we are kinda busy here.

cheers,
Matthias

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 13/06/2007 at 07:09, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Howdy,

Hmmmmm, When I load the CD now, I get the same thing as in your attached images, but I'm afraid to try anything because it works now, and I don't want to screw anything up. :o(

I had the 2005 beta version on there, so that had to be uninstalled first. But seems to me, I remember totally deleting everything and then starting fresh, just to get the option.

I have another machine with windows on it, let me see what happens when I install it fresh on there. I'll have to install 2003 first, because the 2005 is an upgrade and it searches for qualifying products. :o(

Adios,
Cactus Dan

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 13/06/2007 at 07:21, xxxxxxxx wrote:

argh, that would be bad if I had to reinstall everything! Would be great if you could try on that other machine you have what it´s supposed to look like. Thank you!