Still can't get a 64bit version compiled

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 29/09/2006 at 09:19, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Howdy,

OK, nevermind. I just made a copy of the folder and put it in another location and named it "Cinema 4D 9.6 64bit", just to keep it separate from the rest.

And now, I have successfully compiled the cinema4dsdk project for 64bit. Yee-Ha!

Adios,
Cactus Dan

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 29/09/2006 at 15:08, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Dan,

Great to hear! Now get to work!

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 29/09/2006 at 15:38, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Howdy,

Hehe, I'm on it. ;o)

Adios,
Cactus Dan

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 16/05/2007 at 06:13, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Howdy Dan,

can you tell me how this all works on a 32-bit platform? I cannot get it to work. In the configuration manager I don´t even get the x64 platform option. What do I need to get this running?

Thanks

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 16/05/2007 at 06:22, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Howdy,

It seems that when installing MS Visual Studio 2005 Standard on a 32 bit machine, the default installation is 32 bit only. I had to go back and select the option to also install the 64 bit. That was something I missed the first time I installed, and had to reinstall it.

Adios,
Cactus Dan

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 16/05/2007 at 06:27, xxxxxxxx wrote:

oh sh**. Thanks, I think I have also chosen 32-bit only back then. Argh..ok, I try a reinstallation. Thanks so far!

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 16/05/2007 at 07:08, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Even on the 64-bit systems you have to be sure to select 64-bit for the install - at least I had this with VS2003. Maybe VS2005 now installs default for the target install system (?).

Good luck, Samir!

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 16/05/2007 at 07:09, xxxxxxxx wrote:

hmm, when I reinstall, I don´t get an option for 64-Bit in my express installation. Was it the Visual C++ express installation where this happened or is it the platform SDK that you mean?

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 16/05/2007 at 07:12, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Howdy,

AH! The "Express" version doesn't have the 64bit option. You need at least the "Standard" version.

Adios,
Cactus Dan

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 16/05/2007 at 07:37, xxxxxxxx wrote:

As Cactus Dan says. :E

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 16/05/2007 at 07:42, xxxxxxxx wrote:

no problem robert, I was too lazy in the past to buy the standard version. Now that´s a good reason to finally do so. thx!

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 16/05/2007 at 07:47, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Howdy,

There was an upgrade from MSVC++.net 2003 to MSVC++ 2005 Standard that saved me some money on it.

You may also have some sort of upgrade option.

Adios,
Cactus Dan

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 16/05/2007 at 07:54, xxxxxxxx wrote:

thanks for the hint. I´ll be checking on this.

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 12/06/2007 at 10:53, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Ok, now got my Standard installed (woosh, 5 fu*** CDs and a Service Pack update of 500 MB. Sigh, I miss the good ol C64 days.

Anyway, it now works to get that compiler to do what it needs. But I get a C4311 error in the TreeView Function GetId()

The migration docs say:
"Watch out for type cast warnings. E.g. the line LONG converted_ptr = (LONG)&data; will result in a warning warning C4311: 'type cast' : pointer truncation from 'BaseContainer *' to 'LONG'.. You need to change this code to VLONG converted_ptr = (VLONG)&data;."

And I am sure that I changed the function in my code correctly. Here it is:

virtual VLONG GetId(void *root, void *userdata, void *obj)  
{  
     return (VLONG)obj;  
}

But I still get the error? The activeobject sdk example uses it in the same way.

Anybody a clue why it´s not working?

Thanks!

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 12/06/2007 at 10:59, xxxxxxxx wrote:

That's odd. Here's how I do it - note no typecasting to VLONG though:

#ifdef WIN64  
//*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*  
VLONG GetId(void* root, void* userdata, void* obj)  
//*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*  
{  
     return ((RuntimeItem* )obj)->GetID();  
}  
#else

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 12/06/2007 at 11:12, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Howdy,

Hmmmm, that is odd because that is exactly the same as the SDK example.

Did the SDK project compile fine?

Adios,
Cactus Dan

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 12/06/2007 at 11:15, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Hmm, maybe your LONG value will be casted automatically to VLONG at occurance. As my object has no ID value (cannot simply add it due to stability reasons unfortunately) so I cannot use it.

But as I said, the activeobject example also uses a direct cast of the pointer and it works for me in a R10 32-bit compile.

@Cactus: Will try a sdk compile.

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 12/06/2007 at 11:22, xxxxxxxx wrote:

yep, compiles just fine. Hmm, strange. Then it must be something in my code, but what could that be in such a small and straight function? It´s an old implementation, did anything change over time in the treeview handling?

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 12/06/2007 at 11:27, xxxxxxxx wrote:

ok, I simply got rid of the plugin and tried a compile, but now I also get 2001 and 2019 errors. I checked the installation but there was no 64-bit option. Darn, don´t tell me I missed it, I specifically kept an eye on this option during installation and wondered why it didn´t come up, but thought it may come later.

At which point does the installer ask for it?

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 12/06/2007 at 11:34, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Howdy,

Yes, I missed the insallation of the 64 bit, too, and had to go back and reinstall it. :o(

If I remember correctly, it was an option that you had to select on one of the pages in the installer window.

Adios,
Cactus Dan