userdata work around
-
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 27/08/2009 at 05:57, xxxxxxxx wrote:
User Information:
Cinema 4D Version: 10.5
Platform: Mac OSX ;
Language(s) : C.O.F.F.E.E ;---------
Hi
I was hoping to find a way of gathering up all my userdata from a null to put into an array, but I saw from the forum that coffee might not support this<<"I'd like to check if an object has user data(s) , how many , and their name . Do you think it's possible in coffee ?">>
is there a work around for this? could I make a null with one userdata field, then copy and paste as many as I need and in my coffee script loop through all the nulls of the same name to find out how many userdata fields there are, or is there a much simpler way?
Kind regards Conor
-
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 27/08/2009 at 07:27, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi I've just been looking at kattkieru's post about "BaseContainer and user data". I have a null with two user data fields (one is 56 the other 24) and I've tried the code
main(doc,op)
{var op = doc->FindObject("userdata");
var bc = op->GetContainer();
var i = 0;
while (bc->GetIndexId(i) != NOTOK)
{
println(bc->GetIndexData(i));
i++;
}
}
but I get
0
10.000000
1.000000
0
[Object-0x17a1d32c]in the console window, have I completely misunderstood this code if I'm expecting it to print the contents of the user data?
Kind regards Conor -
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 27/08/2009 at 08:01, xxxxxxxx wrote:
It's not possible to iterate through userdata in COFFEE.
Userdata can only be accessed directly in COFFEE, like this: var data = op#ID_USERDATA:1
The only workaround is described in this thread:
For full userdata access you have to use the C++ API.
cheers,
Matthias -
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 27/08/2009 at 08:12, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Thanks Matthias, I'll give that a go.
cheers
Conor