Maxon Developers Maxon Developers
    • Documentation
      • Cinema 4D Python API
      • Cinema 4D C++ API
      • Cineware API
      • ZBrush GoZ API
      • Code Examples on Github
    • Forum
    • Downloads
    • Support
      • Support Procedures
      • Registered Developer Program
      • Plugin IDs
      • Contact Us
    • Categories
      • Overview
      • News & Information
      • Cinema 4D SDK Support
      • Cineware SDK Support
      • ZBrush 4D SDK Support
      • Bugs
      • General Talk
    • Unread
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Users
    • Login

    Getting Serial number in NETrender

    SDK Help
    0
    26
    15.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • H
      Helper
      last edited by

      THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

      On 14/10/2009 at 12:52, xxxxxxxx wrote:

      *crosspost* ๐Ÿ™‚

      I don't agree with tcastudios take on this. I don't care if someone has a license version of my plugin or not to do NET Render work. Anyway, without a license for Cinema 4D itself, they can't even load a document and use NET Render to render it from there - they'll just have a bunch of malfunctioning garbage with '?' for the unregistered plugins required. So, they can get a c4d document with my plugin being used and render it with NET Render but that is about it.

      For several of the render farms out there, I simply provide them the plugin - no serial number needed. Less work for me, less stress on them. ๐Ÿ˜„

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • H
        Helper
        last edited by

        THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

        On 14/10/2009 at 14:00, xxxxxxxx wrote:

        Robert, there must be a misunderstanding here.
        All my plugin do run -without- licenses on NET, and I recommended
        that that is a good idea.

        Having licenses for NET is just a hustle for renderfarms to do installs
        and possible just make life complicated for all.

        What I meant was, in the case that anyone should run them without buying a license (for the main app) they cannot count on any support.

        Luckely no problems have turned up and the prominent commercial
        renderfarms have all bought a main license.

        Cheers
        Lennart

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H
          Helper
          last edited by

          THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

          On 14/10/2009 at 14:50, xxxxxxxx wrote:

          I misunderstood then. Sorry about that.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • H
            Helper
            last edited by

            THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

            On 14/10/2009 at 23:28, xxxxxxxx wrote:

            ah, ok.. didnt know how that whole net thing works.. now i guess i understand..

            thanks a lot to all of you!

            cheers,
            ello

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • H
              Helper
              last edited by

              THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

              On 05/06/2011 at 07:46, xxxxxxxx wrote:

              Hi Robert,

              I notice that you use two separate versions ofย  Rijndael.h in your code sample.ย ย  would you mind sharing what changes you had to make for it to work on Mac?

              Thanks,

              Shawn

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • H
                Helper
                last edited by

                THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

                On 05/06/2011 at 21:33, xxxxxxxx wrote:

                Shawn,

                There were some changes required between the OSs.ย ย  I'll attached them to a PM. ๐Ÿ™‚

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post