Custom Lasso Selection

Helper

On 07/07/2016 at 16:17, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Hi kbar,
I'm not using polygon indices. I'm using their coordinates.
That part is working as expected for me.

The Test(x,y) function though should return a Bool. Not a random value.
Sure I can ignore it. But it's not right.
It's acting like maybe a pointer somewhere is not given a value. And returning gibberish.
I don't know if it's a bug. Or if it's my fault?

-ScottA

Helper

On 07/07/2016 at 19:13, xxxxxxxx wrote:

C4D sometimes internally uses the Bool to return additional information, which is why Bool is actually defined as an int and not a bool. But as far as the outside world is concerned you just treat it as true or false.

Will let the SDK guys handle it

Helper

On 08/07/2016 at 09:11, xxxxxxxx wrote:

@Kent: Actually we are not sad at all, if you do our job

@Scott: It's exactly as Kent said, internally Bool is (yet) an integer, so it can return more than just true and false. And this is still sometimes used for historic and internal reasons. But you (in the sense of every 3rd party developer) really should handle it as a Bool, so you don't run into troubles, when this might change at some point in future. So just check the return value of Test() on (in-)equality to zero.

Helper

On 08/07/2016 at 09:34, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Ok. Thanks.
I just wanted to be sure I wasn't doing it wrong.

Although targeting a specific point with the Text(x,y) is working (aside from the random int values).
I'm having a hard time getting it to work properly on each point, of each object, in the scene.
I'm using a C4DObjectList to grab all the objects. And then I'm using LassoSelection code similar to what I posted on them. But I'm getting inconsistent results.

This is going to be a fight.
But I'll keep working on it.

-ScottA

Helper

On 09/07/2016 at 10:34, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Can you please ask the developers about this?
The TestPolygon() function is not working properly for me in the Parallel & Perspective views.

//This code will generate a lasso selection in a tooldata plugin  
//But the lasso selects polygons even if the lasso is not over them, when not using an orthographic view!! (top,bottom,left,right)  
//Is there a bug in the TestPolygon() function? Or is there a special way to use it in the Parallel & Perspective views?  
  
Bool MyTool::MouseInput(BaseDocument *doc, BaseContainer &data, BaseDraw *bd, EditorWindow *win, const BaseContainer &msg)  
{  
  AutoAlloc<LassoSelection> ls;  
  ls->Start(win, MOUSESELECT_FREE);  
  
  BaseObject *obj = doc->GetActiveObject();  
  if (!obj) return false;  
  
  PolygonObject *p_obj = ToPoly(obj);  
  Vector *points = p_obj->GetPointW();  
  LONG polygonCount = p_obj->GetPolygonCount();  
  BaseSelect *polyS = p_obj->GetPolygonS();  
  BaseSelect *pointS = p_obj->GetPointS();  
  Matrix mg = p_obj->GetMg();  
    
  //Start off with nothing selected  
  polyS->DeselectAll();  
  
  for(LONG i=0; i < polygonCount; ++i)  
  {  
      CPolygon poly = p_obj->GetPolygonW()[i];  
  
      //Convert the points of the polygon to Screen space coords (only works in ortho views!!?)  
      //NOTE: The z component can be used to get the distance the point is away from the active camera  
      Vector pa = bd->WS(mg * points[poly.a]);  
      Vector pb = bd->WS(mg * points[poly.b]);  
      Vector pc = bd->WS(mg * points[poly.c]);  
      Vector pd = bd->WS(mg * points[poly.d]);  
   
      Bool test = ls->TestPolygon(pa, pb, pc, pd);  
      GePrint(LongToString(test));  
      if(test == true) polyS->Select(i);     //Select the polygons hit by the lasso  
      else continue;  
  }  
  
  DrawViews(DRAWFLAGS_ONLY_ACTIVE_VIEW|DRAWFLAGS_NO_THREAD|DRAWFLAGS_NO_ANIMATION);  
  SpecialEventAdd(EVMSG_UPDATEHIGHLIGHT);  
  
  return TRUE;  
}

Thanks,
-ScottA

Helper

On 12/07/2016 at 13:37, xxxxxxxx wrote:

FYI, I'll look into it as soon as possible.

Helper

On 12/07/2016 at 16:01, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Thanks Andreas,
I'm thinking that maybe the camera's matrix might need to be included in the mix somehow?

Also - The clipping params. are not doing anything.
I tried setting them to all kinds of values, and no matter what values I used it does nothing. !Confused[URL-REMOVED]

-ScottA

[URL-REMOVED] @maxon: This section contained a non-resolving link which has been removed.

Helper

On 15/07/2016 at 08:36, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Hi Scott,

I looked into it, the answer won't make you happy.

First of all, in my tests, I can't say it doesn't work at all in perspective view. But I agree, it sometimes selects polys the lasso wasn't actually drawn upon.
The thing is by default TestPolygon uses the bounding box of the drawn lasso. This has historical reasons. Internally the function has an additional parameter to change this behavior, which unfortunately never surfaced to the SDK. So there's currently no way for you to change this behavior.
The good news is, you did everything correctly

I filed a bug report on this topic.

Regarding the clipping, I haven't had the time to look into it. Unfortunately I'll be on vacation until July, 26th and the others in the team are currently pretty loaded. So this will have to wait until I'm back, sorry.

Helper

On 15/07/2016 at 10:38, xxxxxxxx wrote:

OK. Thanks. I had a feeling that this thing was buggered.

While I was waiting. I manged to write my own custom lasso tool from scratch.
It's not as efficient as the one in C4D. Probably due to me not caching things as much.
But it works. So I'll keep working on it rather than try to use the one in the SDK.

-ScottA

Helper

On 29/07/2016 at 09:12, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Hi Scott,

just wanted to add info on the clipping parameters, even if you don't need it anymore.
The clipping parameters are completely ignored for the editor window.

I'll have a note on this added to the docs.

I haven't had the time to test it, but I think, these work only in your own GeUserArea.
I'd rather not invest more time into investigating this, as I probably already have disappointed some other community members, by not focusing on their threads (hey, mp5gosu, sorry, you are not forgotten) and you seem to have moved on and don't need it anymore.

Helper

On 29/07/2016 at 12:00, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Ok thanks.
I gave up on the SDK functions since they are not working correctly. And wrote one from scratch.
I'll bet I'm the only person that has even tried using them since they were written decades ago.

Yeah. The forum did explode with lots of hard questions this week.
Sucks to be you buddy.

-ScottA

Helper

On 30/07/2016 at 00:36, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Nah, actually it's fun to work with you guys. No, need to worry about us

And I wouldn't say, the SDK functions do not work correctly, actually they do. They are just somewhat limited and we need to document the special cases better. Which is on my list.