Maxon Developers Maxon Developers
    • Documentation
      • Cinema 4D Python API
      • Cinema 4D C++ API
      • Cineware API
      • ZBrush Python API
      • ZBrush GoZ API
      • Code Examples on Github
    • Forum
    • Downloads
    • Support
      • Support Procedures
      • Registered Developer Program
      • Plugin IDs
      • Contact Us
    • Categories
      • Overview
      • News & Information
      • Cinema 4D SDK Support
      • Cineware SDK Support
      • ZBrush 4D SDK Support
      • Bugs
      • General Talk
    • Unread
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Users
    • Login

    WeightTag smoothing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved SDK Help
    5 Posts 0 Posters 446 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • H Offline
      Helper
      last edited by

      THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

      On 08/05/2012 at 23:17, xxxxxxxx wrote:

      User Information:
      Cinema 4D Version:   R12-R13 
      Platform:   Windows  ;   Mac OSX  ; 
      Language(s) :     C++  ;

      ---------
      Is there any way to access the smoothing feature of the Weights Manager from a plugin (SDK)?  If not, can you point me to references to algorithms or code that implements something relevant to performing this type of smoothing of the weight maps based on Strength and Distance?

      Thanks!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • H Offline
        Helper
        last edited by

        THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

        On 09/05/2012 at 08:07, xxxxxxxx wrote:

        I've accessed the weights manager through Python. But I haven't had a chance to convert it to C++ yet. It's something I was planning on doing at some point.
        The most important thing to know is that you have to have the weight brush tool open at the same time. Or none of your code will execute in the weight manager.

        Here's a python example:

        import c4d  
        def main() :  
          c4d.CallCommand(1019499)                              #Launch Weight Tool  
          c4d.CallCommand(1025028)                              #Launch Weights Manager  
          tool = doc.GetActiveToolData()  
          tool[c4d.ID_CA_WEIGHT_TOOL_WEIGHTS_HIDE_ZERO] = 0     #Sets this checkbox option to off  
            
          tool=doc.GetAction()  
          tool=c4d.plugins.FindPlugin(tool, c4d.PLUGINTYPE_TOOL)   
          #c4d.CallButton(tool, c4d.ID_CA_WEIGHT_TOOL_FN_CLEARWEIGHT)  #Deletes the weighting on the selected joint  
          c4d.CallButton(tool, c4d.ID_CA_WEIGHT_TOOL_MIRROR)           #Executes the Auto Mirror button  
          
          c4d.EventAdd()  
          
        if __name__=='__main__':  
          main()
        

        For C++. The [] stuff needs to be converted to GetParameter()&SetParameter(). As well as the button codes.
        If you do end up using this and converting it to C++. Please post an example in this thread.
        That would save me the trouble of converting it myself.

        P.S.- Here's the .h file resources: ..\..\..\..\resource\modules\ca\res\description oolcaweight.h

        -ScottA

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H Offline
          Helper
          last edited by

          THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

          On 16/05/2012 at 06:47, xxxxxxxx wrote:

          Hi Robert,

          I asked the developers and no, there is no direct access to the smoothing feature of the Weights Manager.
          Sorry, I can't point you to any resources. It is a fairly standard smoothing (points within distance, average, falloff).

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • H Offline
            Helper
            last edited by

            THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

            On 30/05/2012 at 23:18, xxxxxxxx wrote:

            Smoothing is one thing.  Determining the surface geodesics for distance is another altogether.  There are so many ways to do this (from Djikstra to Newton-Raphson to a different method for every paper that I find).  For speed, an approximate shortest geodesic algorithm should suffice.  Can you provide any hints on that by chance?

            This is something new to me so please be kind. 🙂

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • H Offline
              Helper
              last edited by

              THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

              On 01/06/2012 at 02:06, xxxxxxxx wrote:

              If exact geodesic distances are not crucial then I say go for Dijkstra's algorithm. If your mesh is reasonably well behaved then that should give you a decent approximation.

              Another option could be to not use geodesics, but to consider 3D distances instead.

              Best regards
              /Filip

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post