Maxon Developers Maxon Developers
    • Documentation
      • Cinema 4D Python API
      • Cinema 4D C++ API
      • Cineware API
      • ZBrush Python API
      • ZBrush GoZ API
      • Code Examples on Github
    • Forum
    • Downloads
    • Support
      • Support Procedures
      • Registered Developer Program
      • Plugin IDs
      • Contact Us
    • Categories
      • Overview
      • News & Information
      • Cinema 4D SDK Support
      • Cineware SDK Support
      • ZBrush 4D SDK Support
      • Bugs
      • General Talk
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Users
    • Login

    Display Null without dot in a Generator

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved SDK Help
    7 Posts 0 Posters 679 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • H Offline
      Helper
      last edited by

      THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

      On 03/10/2009 at 13:44, xxxxxxxx wrote:

      User Information:
      Cinema 4D Version:   9.6-11.5 
      Platform:   Windows  ; Mac  ;  
      Language(s) :     C++  ;

      ---------
      Hi,

      I got a question about the display of Null-Objects.
      I have a generator plugin that creates a virtual hierarchy of objects, including some nulls. Now as there's quite some null used, the display gets a little messy as there's 'null-dots' all over the place.

      Is there a way to turn off the display of those null dots ?

      I dont want to make the null invisible for editor, as i would have to do the opposite for all children, which might lead to complications.

      Maybe there's a way to exclude null's in a virtual hierarchy from being drawn in the editor, like with the display menu in cinema ?

      thanks,
      Daniel

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • H Offline
        Helper
        last edited by

        THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

        On 03/10/2009 at 14:50, xxxxxxxx wrote:

        Try to use

        > <code>
        > null->SetEditorMode(MODE_OFF);
        > </code>

        in Virtual Hierarchy for your Null objects. Maybe this works.

        Cheers, Sebastian

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H Offline
          Helper
          last edited by

          THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

          On 03/10/2009 at 15:13, xxxxxxxx wrote:

          Hi,

          i want to avoid doing it like that, because then I'd have to make the null's children visible explicitly, while i would prefer to have their editor mode undefined so that they inherit their editor mode from parent.

          So im actually looking for another way then turning off editor mode.

          greetings,
          Daniel

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • H Offline
            Helper
            last edited by

            THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

            On 04/10/2009 at 08:10, xxxxxxxx wrote:

            You mean the View->Filter menu I assume.

            I don't think there is another direct option to hide Null objects. How about adding it to a layer and changing its visible option? If the children are not added to the layer, they continue in their editor mode visibility. This option isn't available in R9.6 though - only R10 onward.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • H Offline
              Helper
              last edited by

              THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

              On 05/10/2009 at 03:33, xxxxxxxx wrote:

              yeah layers are not an option cos it should work from 9.6 onwards. Maybe I'll just use another Object for grouping internally, like an empty instance, which has no dot displayed at its position afaik.

              Or I'll just do my own 'null'-object, but i guess its not relly neccessary 😉

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • H Offline
                Helper
                last edited by

                THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

                On 05/10/2009 at 03:35, xxxxxxxx wrote:

                Another possiblity is to write your own NULL object.

                cheers,
                Matthias

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • H Offline
                  Helper
                  last edited by

                  THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

                  On 05/10/2009 at 05:23, xxxxxxxx wrote:

                  thanks everybody, I'll probably do it with the instances, as it probably makes no difference anyway and is less effort for me 😉

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post