Maxon Developers Maxon Developers
    • Documentation
      • Cinema 4D Python API
      • Cinema 4D C++ API
      • Cineware API
      • ZBrush Python API
      • ZBrush GoZ API
      • Code Examples on Github
    • Forum
    • Downloads
    • Support
      • Support Procedures
      • Registered Developer Program
      • Plugin IDs
      • Contact Us
    • Categories
      • Overview
      • News & Information
      • Cinema 4D SDK Support
      • Cineware SDK Support
      • ZBrush 4D SDK Support
      • Bugs
      • General Talk
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login

    Radiosity.cpp - why commented?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved SDK Help
    2 Posts 0 Posters 194 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • H Offline
      Helper
      last edited by

      THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

      On 30/04/2005 at 04:33, xxxxxxxx wrote:

      User Information:
      Cinema 4D Version:   9.1 
      Platform:      
      Language(s) :     C++  ;

      ---------
      Hi,

      Just wondering why the Radiosity example is not used? I noticed it was like this too in R8.

      Is it just for reference on some of the more complicated PostData functions?
      I noticed, that without modification, it does not compile in R9.

      I just find it strange that an entire plugin example is commented all out

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • H Offline
        Helper
        last edited by

        THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

        On 30/04/2005 at 09:32, xxxxxxxx wrote:

        You can only have one radiosity hook, registering another one will overide or be ignored, therefore it's commented out so that it doesn't replace the inbuilt radiosity, as you can see from the code it's not exactly a working model, though it wouldn't take much to turn it into a working montecarlo algorithm.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • First post
          Last post