DESC_HIDE and DESC_EDITABLE
-
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 17/07/2012 at 23:24, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm asking me which elements from lib_description.h are implemented in python at the moment.
In this forum there's a lot stuff dealing with hide/disable datafields, and it's a little confusing me.After looking for a method to disable some fields of my tag-plugin I found an example that shows how to hide single userdata-fields. And it works great.
import c4d from c4d import documents def main() : doc = documents.GetActiveDocument() obj = doc.SearchObject("Null") #v1 = obj[c4d.ID_USERDATA,1] #v2 = obj[c4d.ID_USERDATA,2] allUserdatas = obj.GetUserDataContainer() for descId, container in allUserdatas: id = descId[1].id if id == 2: container[15] = False obj.SetUserDataContainer(descId, container)
The id 15 = DESC_HIDE and it works as expected. But when I try to use DESC_EDITABLE (to grey the field out/disable it) by using the id 26 nothing happens.
I guess not all id's are implemented yet?
And does anybody know a method how to access not only the userdata?I've tried the same with GetDataInstance() but as expected it doesn't work.
import c4d from c4d import documents def main() : doc = documents.GetActiveDocument() obj = doc.SearchObject("Scheibe") allData = obj.GetDataInstance() for descId, container in allData: id = descId[1].id #doesn't work, cause int is unsubscriptable if descId == 1161: container[15] = True #doesn't work, cause float does not support item assignment
Does anybody has an idea?
Cheers,
Sven -
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 18/07/2012 at 01:52, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi Sven,
It's currently only possible to access the description of an object's user data.
DESC_EDITABLE is used to disable "Edit Entry" in the popupmenu (DESC_REMOVEABLE for "Remove Entry"). This is only useful with object parameters.
EDIT: Are you trying to edit the description of your own TagData plugin?
-
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 18/07/2012 at 03:36, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi Yannik,
that's right. It's like the 'alignToSpline'-Tag where the PRIM_AXIS is only a accessible when tangential is set to true.
So it's even not possible by using GetDEnabling?
-
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 18/07/2012 at 05:48, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Originally posted by xxxxxxxx
So it's even not possible by using GetDEnabling?
Yes it's possible overriding GetDEnabling(). You return True when the requested id enabling is PRIM_AXIS.
-
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 18/07/2012 at 05:49, xxxxxxxx wrote:
You can grey-out elements with GetDEnabling(). That's IMHO the better version for "not-so-complex-guis". It's less distracting than elements that suddenly disappear.
-
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 18/07/2012 at 05:55, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi Niklas,
you're right. For the user it is very confusing when single elements suddenly appear/disappear.
Then I'll try this "GetDEnabling()-Thing".
Seems a little bit weird after all I've read about it in this forum.Thank you Niklas.
-
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 18/07/2012 at 06:23, xxxxxxxx wrote:
All great.
Works like it done never anything else.
Thank you both.Now I've only to deal with the 'argument 5'-error thrown form the super-call.
It's really an interesting error - when it would not be so disgusting.return super(AlignOnMultiSpline, self).GetDEnabling(self, node, id, t_data, flags, itemdesc)
throws "TypeError: function takes at most 5 arguments (6 given)".
return super(AlignOnMultiSpline, self).GetDEnabling(node, id, t_data, flags, itemdesc)
throws "TypeError: argument 5".
Nice.
-
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 18/07/2012 at 10:02, xxxxxxxx wrote:
The latter call is correct. But it seems to be a bug in the SDK. See here.
-Nik
-
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 18/07/2012 at 22:34, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Ok, I can see it.
Thx for your great help. You saved my day.Sven
Edit: Fxxx, I've forgot the
op.InsertUnder(op)
statement.