passing arrays as parameters

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 01/04/2012 at 04:45, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Originally posted by xxxxxxxx

Originally posted by xxxxxxxx

@jack: Just a note, returning allocated memory from a function is considered bad. It's also some kind of confusing (imho).

If it was considered bad, I don't think we would have any Alloc() functions in the API...
BaseObject *op = BaseObject::Alloc(Onull);

Sorry didn't add that. We have Free() functions according to them, which is not considered bad.
-Niklas

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 02/04/2012 at 00:43, xxxxxxxx wrote:

hi,

i have got another question. i am still messing with my objectdata plugin. it basicly returns
different geometry types based on data entered by the user (disc,plane,sphere...). as they
extend some of basic capeabilities of c4ds baseobjects i thought it would be smart to
outsource their allocation.

currently it is something like this :

BaseObject *Opolylight::GetVirtualObjects(BaseObject *op, HierarchyHelp *hh)
{
	...
	return GetPlane(op);
}
  
static BaseObject *Opolylight::GetPlane(BaseObject *op)
{
	BaseObject *result = NULL;
	result = BaseObject::Alloc(Oplane);
  
	BaseContainer *outbc = result->GetDataInstance();
	BaseContainer *inbc = op->GetDataInstance();
  
	...
	return result;
}

i am roughly following the SDK ATOM sample. but while the atom sample is just outsourcing into
one other method form GetVirtualObjects, in my case it would make sense to have one method
for each objecttype (GetPlane, GetDisc ...).

my question is now : when the user changes the ouput from plane to disc the allocated mem from
GetPlane still remains alltough it isn't used anymore. by defining the method as static i prevent
the code from creating multiple instances, but my addon will still carry a bunch of data for each
shape the user has choosen once.

is this considered as a memory leak / bad ?

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 02/04/2012 at 01:48, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Do you mean, the function itself still exists and redundant when not used anymore?

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 02/04/2012 at 01:56, xxxxxxxx wrote:

the function is a pointer pointing on a baseobject, but somewhere this chain of pointer madness
has to end, in my example it ends at result = BaseObject::Alloc(Oplane);. i thought it works this
way :

1. GetVirtualObjects is called
2. GetVirtualObjects calls GetPlane
3. GetPlane allocates some memory at adress xyz and creates a BaseObject there
4. GetPlane returns xyz
5. GetVirtualObjects is called again
6. GetVirtualObjects calls GetSphere

what happens with the BaseObject @ memory adress xyz ?

i guess i am geting something wrong again

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 02/04/2012 at 02:21, xxxxxxxx wrote:

In the SDK are often notes that say "Cinema 4D owns the pointed/returned object." which means Cinema will manage the memory of the object. I can't find such a note in the ObjectData::GetVirtualObjects() documentation. They either forgot to add it or you have to manage that on your own, i.e. cache the object and free it on the next call to GetVirtualObjects(). I haven't written a C++ plugin yet, (as I said, I refuse to use VC. ).

Cheers,
-Niklas

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 02/04/2012 at 02:37, xxxxxxxx wrote:

uh i made a mis take in my example, when i shortend the code, it has to be

static BaseObject * ~~Opolylight::~~ GetPlane(BaseObject *op)
    
    {
    
    	BaseObject *result = NULL;
    
    	result = BaseObject::Alloc(Oplane);
    
      
    
    
    	BaseContainer *outbc = result->GetDataInstance();
    
    	BaseContainer *inbc = op->GetDataInstance();
    
      
    
    
    	...
    
    	return result;
    
    }

of course.

  


@ nikklas

  


i am not talking about GetVirtualObjects, it is called on each update and there are examples in 

the sdk how to treat cases in which GetVirtualObject fails to produce a propper output (free

the memory).

  


but i have firgured it out somehow i guess, i have just to create some kind of garbagecollector 

method which clears all the unused static pointer method adresses. i'll report back when i fail again :)

  


ps : refusing to praise & and use microsoft products is considered to be a mortal sin by the spanish

inquisition.

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 02/04/2012 at 05:27, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Whatever object you return in GetVirtualObjects(), don't care about its memory anymore. Cinema takes over the ownership.

If you allocate an object but don't return it at the end of GetVirtualObjects(), you have to free it yourself of course.

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 02/04/2012 at 08:44, xxxxxxxx wrote:

hi,

and here i am again, i tried to check my code so i placed a c4d_debug.txt in my c4d folder.
first i started c4d from the desktop and the console window said meh, debugger not present
so i started c4d from vs using my project (which compiles and runs fine atm), c4d crashes again
with the exception floating point division by zero. so i tried the sdk_examples with the 32 bit debug
platform. it starts without any errors, but the console doesn't show up, not while debugging, not after.

i am on vista 64 bit, c4d demo 32 bit and VS 8.0.5

has someone experience with this odd behaviour ?

sorry, for throwing random questions at you

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 02/04/2012 at 22:05, xxxxxxxx wrote:

for the Console to show up you need to set the startup directory in VS to the c4d folder (project properties -> debugging). Else it won't find the c4d_debug.txt
or you put the c4d_debug.txt in the plugin's folder

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 03/04/2012 at 01:29, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Originally posted by xxxxxxxx

so i placed a c4d_debug.txt in my c4d folder.

Already said, that text file better goes into your plugin's folder. Otherwise, Cinema will do the memory trace everytime your start it, and that is usually not desired.

Originally posted by xxxxxxxx

i started c4d from vs using my project (which compiles and runs fine atm)

That's the right way to do. Create a Debug build in VS and use the "Play" button to start Cinema in the VS Debugger.

Originally posted by xxxxxxxx

c4d crashes again with the exception floating point division by zero.
so i tried the sdk_examples with the 32 bit debug
platform. it starts without any errors

Then the DivByZero is definitely a bug in your code ALWAYS check for zero before doing any division (or take care that zero will never occur).

Originally posted by xxxxxxxx

sorry, for throwing random questions at you

That's OK, but I really think you should open separate threads for separate questions. That way, it will be much easier for other people to find your questions and the answers.

Helper

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 26/04/2012 at 18:40, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Yes, I already said this. An argument will be put into a CPU register if available otherwise it goes onto the stack. This is why four or less arguments for a method are faster. As someone with nearly 30 years of programming and most of that using C/C++, I definitely know what the hell I'm talking about.

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/zthk2dkh%28v=vs.80%29.aspx