Maxon Developers Maxon Developers
    • Documentation
      • Cinema 4D Python API
      • Cinema 4D C++ API
      • Cineware API
      • ZBrush Python API
      • ZBrush GoZ API
      • Code Examples on Github
    • Forum
    • Downloads
    • Support
      • Support Procedures
      • Registered Developer Program
      • Plugin IDs
      • Contact Us
    • Categories
      • Overview
      • News & Information
      • Cinema 4D SDK Support
      • Cineware SDK Support
      • ZBrush 4D SDK Support
      • Bugs
      • General Talk
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Users
    • Login
    The Maxon SDK Team is currently short staffed due to the winter holidays. No forum support is being provided between 15/12/2025 and 5/1/2026. For details see Maxon SDK 2025 Winter Holidays.

    No 'x64' Platform solution?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved SDK Help
    3 Posts 0 Posters 300 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • H Offline
      Helper
      last edited by

      THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

      On 06/09/2005 at 01:35, xxxxxxxx wrote:

      User Information:
      Cinema 4D Version:   9.1 
      Platform:   Windows  ;   
      Language(s) :     C++  ;

      ---------
      I just updated my AMD64 system to Windows XP Pro x64, installed Cinema 4D R9.1 64-bit edition, and Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 beta.

      Reading through your 'migration documentation', I see that you should, as expected, select an 'x64' target under new Platform Solution in Configuration Manager. But there is only "Pocket PC (ArmV4)" and "Smartphone (ArmV4)". I did a default install of VS2005.

      I do notice that the version of Visual Studio is "Team Suite". Did I get screwed and receive the incorrect version or is this it? How do I get to an x64 target when there are none from which to choose?

      Microsoft had better have some info on this - what's the use of all of the time just spent updating (many, many, many hours) to migrate to 64-bits if the end result is no 64-bit targets?

      Peeved as hell,
      Robert

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • H Offline
        Helper
        last edited by

        THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

        On 06/09/2005 at 01:47, xxxxxxxx wrote:

        As far as I remember the 64 bit target is not enabled by default in the installer.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H Offline
          Helper
          last edited by

          THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

          On 06/09/2005 at 01:52, xxxxxxxx wrote:

          Yes, I just checked and saw that. "Welcome" to Micro.... (fill in the blank). They can't autodetect 64-bit hardware and their own friggin' OS and install the x64 compiler by default - or at least ask you?

          So, for all future generations:

          Don't use the default installer as it doesn't install anything you actually need. Now I remember why I spend 15 minutes customizing Office Pro installation settings - because their defaults, well, suck. 😉

          Thanks and long live any other OS.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post