ScaleBicubic erases image?

[Helper]

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 15/08/2005 at 04:38, xxxxxxxx wrote:

User Information:
Cinema 4D Version:   9.102 
Platform:   Windows  ;   
Language(s) :     C++  ;

---------

I want to scale down images and copy them
into one big image by

image[0]->ScaleBicubic(bigImage, 0, 0, 500, 500, 0, 0, 100, 100);
image[1]->ScaleBicubic(bigImage, 0, 0, 500, 500, 100, 100, 200, 200);

The resulting image only contains one of the two
pictures as if the other would be overridden with
black color. Is this the way it should work?

Init. looks like:

BaseBitmap *m_bigImage;
bigImage = BaseBitmap::Alloc();
bigImage->Init(200, 200, 32);

[Helper]

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 15/08/2005 at 04:44, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Search the forum for "scalebicubic". There should be an example posting somewhere that shows how to use it (by Mikael if I remember correctly)

[Helper]

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 15/08/2005 at 05:09, xxxxxxxx wrote:

I've read all posts concering "scalebicubic"
and found besides a comment and link by Mikael
a topic named "Bicubic Scale - Bug?" by Hasibuzi

After testing my code, I found that this is
my only problem: The 2nd line doesn't place
the image at (100, 100) but also in (0, 0).

Since Hasibuzi didn't get a reply, is this a
bug or just a feature?

[Helper]

THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

On 15/08/2005 at 05:20, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Init of course is:

bigImage->Init(201, 201, 32);