administrators

Private

Posts

  • RE: Thread safety when handling CTrack in TagData.Message() on button click

    @ThomasB said in Thread safety when handling CTrack in TagData.Message() on button click:

    I think you misunderstood me. I’m not trying to report a bug here, since the issue isn't with Cinema 4D itself.

    No, I did not misunderstood your situation (at least I think so šŸ˜„ ). We sometimes ask people to report a formal bug report so that we can reproduce an issue. This is not necessarily bound to the bug being in Cinema 4D. Although we often do this when we suspect that the bug is on the Cinema side or at least in a grey area where the plugin does something that is not so great but Cinema also drops the ball in some shape or form.

    Your code, at least the one you shared with us, does not do anything wrong. And even though I know you have put a lot of work in your reply here, a lot of text and diagrams do not help in concretely fixing the issue. To answer a few questions anyway:

    1. NodeData::Message usually runs on the main thread (and you additionally check), so we are fine.
    2. Dialog code also usually runs on the main thread. The only exception can be drawing code (something like GeUseraArea::DrawMsg), although drawing code usually also runs in a special section of the main thread. Hence my hint to use GeIsMainThreadAndNoDrawThread instead of GeIsMainThread in my first posting.
    3. Generally there is no guarantee that any code runs on the MT. As an example, NodeData::Message calls are usually on the MT, especially the message MSG_DESCRIPTION_COMMAND. I.e., when a user clicked a button in your node this should run on the MT as you often want to do GUI things or modify the scene. And Cinema will (should) honor this. But nothing prevents me, Evil Bob the developer, from grabbing your tag, creating a new thread then calling yourTag.Message(MSG_DESCRIPTION_COMMAND, BaseContainer()) from this new thread and with that violate the assumption that description commands alwary run on the MT.
    4. Core messages are also usually sent from the MT, both in a dialog and in a MessageData; so CoreMessage functions should usually run on the MT. Core message (i.e., event) evaluation is also decoupled. When you set a (core) event from a non-MT thread (via SpecialEventAdd), Cinema should properly synchronize and execute the event on the MT. But there could be of course bugs in our code. You should therefore always shield your code with GeIsMainThreadAndNoDrawThread or GeIsMainThread if your code could also run in a drawing context.

    It is good that you have an eye on the threading safety in Cinema as this is something that often trips developers. But I do not think that threading is here the issue. Threading violations usually lead to crashes, corrupted data, or inexplicable behavior. Slowdowns usually mean that either code runs way more often that you think, e.g. some feedback loop between your tag and dialog, or that there is some resource fighting going on. Playing audio means that hardware resources must be allocated. When they are constantly dropped and reallocated, because something else wants to access them too, this can lead to slowdowns. This is still just a guess into the blue of mine, but it would fit the symptoms you are describing.

    Could you please:

    1. Confirm that the issue also happens for your with the simplified plugin.
    2. Provide a step by step bug report to reproducing the issue as described here.
    3. Check that the issue does not happen when you delete your tag (but leave the sound track in the scene). I really want to rule out that Cinema does not have a problem with audio playback on some hardware in general.

    When push comes to shove, you can also share your full plugin in private with us via sdk_support(at)maxon(dot)com. When you can reproduce the issue with the simplified plugin, this is of course sufficient for us to investigate the issue. But if you cannot reproduce the issue with the simplified plugin, then we would need to see the full plugin to understand what is going on.

    Cheers,
    Ferdinand

    edit: I now also tried on my Win 11 machine (Intel chipset, a bit beefier GPU). And I cannot detect any slowdowns in normal scene playback or when using the RS render view. However, when I use the Calculate Fps tool (just press SHIFT + C and type 'FPS'), I experience distorted audio and the view port becomes sightly laggy. This happens with and without your tag, an audio track alone seem to be enough.

  • RE: TimeLine DopeSheet not update

    Hello,

    This is a bug. I have fieled it under 'ITEM#649699 Timeline does not react to NBIT selection changes on tracks anymore'. It is unfortunately not a bug in the Python or core C++ API which I could just fix myself, but either a bug in the scene evaluation or the timeline. So, we will have to wait until the owning team tackles it. I notified the owners that timeline automation is a popular scripting task and that they therefore should fix this.

    For now, the only thing I can recommend is to use 2026.2 when you want to carry out such tasks.

    Cheers,
    Ferdinand

  • RE: TimeLine DopeSheet not update

    Hello @chuanzhen,

    Thank you for reporting this. At first glance this looks like a bug/regression in 2026.3.0. I'll have to check in more detail myself before I can say for sure. But your code is also incorrect, the NBIT_TLX_SELECT2 bits are internal and not for what you think they are. You must use NBIT_TLX_SELECT instead. But they are currently malfunctioning for me on Windows in 2026.3.

    Until I am sure, I will not yet classify this as a bug.

    Cheers,
    Ferdinand

    In 2026.2.0, this code randomly selects and deselects tracks in an all timelines for the active object. I.e., you can spam-click the script and see the track selections 'jump around'. In 2026.3 it does exactly nothing (at least on my Windows machine).

    import c4d
    import random
    
    def main() -> None:
        for track in op.GetCTracks():
            bit: int = random.choice([c4d.NBITCONTROL_SET, c4d.NBITCONTROL_CLEAR])
            for tl in (c4d.NBIT_TL1_SELECT, c4d.NBIT_TL2_SELECT, c4d.NBIT_TL3_SELECT, c4d.NBIT_TL4_SELECT):
                track.ChangeNBit(tl, bit)
        
        c4d.EventAdd()
    
    
    if __name__ == '__main__':
        main()
    
  • RE: Thread safety when handling CTrack in TagData.Message() on button click

    Hey,

    Can you provide a bit more context? I tried your plugin on Cinema 4D 2025.2.1 and macOS 26.5.1. I added your tag to a scene, clicked the "Add Audio" button, and started playback.

    c1dd2914-3795-4dc5-a7c3-a1fba9066410-image.png

    • I experience no slowdowns when I run the scene playback (F8) or the RS render view.
    • I hear the base_1.wav sound playing your plugin adds.

    Can you please:

    • Provide the type and version of operating system you use.
    • Provide the version of Cinema 4D you use.
    • Describe the hardware you use.
    • Provide an example scene.
    • Check if you experience the same slowdowns when your plugin is being removed from the scene (but the sound track it has added is being left in.
    • If necessary, provide a step-by-step instruction to describe your bug. See here for how to formally make a bug report.

    My hunch right now is that your plugin has probably little to do with the slowdowns, but that sound track playback is the culprit which might lead to 'resource fighting' on some systems.

    Cheers,
    Ferdinand

  • RE: Thread safety when handling CTrack in TagData.Message() on button click

    It did, thanks, I will have a look.

  • RE: Thread safety when handling CTrack in TagData.Message() on button click

    @ThomasB

    Absolutely, but you have to either grant me access or make the whole folder public.

  • GeDialog::GetFilename currently broken in 2026.3.0

    Dear community,

    GeDialog::GetFilename is broken in 2026.3.0 in both the C++ and Python API, returning the empty filename/string, even when a gadget holds a valid string. Plugins using dialogs which use Filename parameters are therefore currently malfunctioning when used in 2026.3.0. The issue does not exist in 2026.2.0 or earlier versions.

    We will deploy the hotfix for this issue in the coming weeks.

    Cheers,
    Ferdinand

  • RE: Thread safety when handling CTrack in TagData.Message() on button click

    Hello @ThomasB,

    could you share your plugin via something like dropbox or google drive with us? You upload above seems to have failed.

    Your code looks fine, you do everything correctly at first glance. You only try to modify the scene in the context of MSG_DESCRIPTION_COMMAND (which should only be invoked from the main thread) and shield yourself against rogue actors by also checking c4d.threading.GeIsMainThread() (slightly better would be GeIsMainThreadAndNoDrawThread but that is just semantics). Your node does also not do anything wildly expensive in its Init/__init__.

    But I am sure you are not just imagining your performance issues. Generally speaking, your code should only run when the user clicks the button with the ID PY_ADD_AUDIO in the description of your tag. So, this should not be able to accidently run when you render or while scene playback (which I assume is what you mean with 'running (an) animation').

    PY_TRACK seems to be a parameter of type DTYPE_BASELINK where you just link the newly created track. I cannot really see anything going wrong with this, as this is very harmless. I also checked if there is any 'special sauce' in creating sound tracks, as they are one of the special tracks, but as far as I can see, we are doing this internally exactly like you do it. So, this also does not seem to be a case of an incorrectly allocated node, which then constantly causes internal errors.

    Cheers,
    Ferdinand

  • RE: How to get selected DescId and BaseList2D at the same time

    Hey @ECHekman,

    well, when a node displays an embedded description (what you exemplify at the case of a BaseLink), it uses a DescriptionCustomGui too. Other parameter types aside from a BaseLink which can do this are for example field lists.

    I am quite frankly a bit surprised that this even bubbles up in the form you report it, that you get a DescID which is selected inside a DescriptionCustomGui that is shown by the node in the DescriptionCustomGui you opened yourself. Attribute Manger selection states (and by extension DescriptionCustomGui) are not a public API feature, as we usually keep our GUIs sealed, i.e., inaccessible to third parties. DescriptionCustomGui is here a bit in a grey area, but I am afraid there is no way to do what you want to do. To do what you want to do, you would need access to internal systems.

    And other than in some other cases, where we do not always had the time to expose something (and are open to the idea of changing something), this is for GUIs not the case; they are intentionally sealed as we do not want third parties to change basic UX concepts.

    My general advice would also be to not to try to overcome this boundary (that a plugin reacts to which parameter in a node is being highlighted by the user), as you break UX conventions of Cinema 4D with that.

    Cheers,
    Ferdinand

    You can do this, but it is very hacky:

    1. Get the description of the node(s) you are currently displaying in the your DescriptionCustomGui.
    2. Check if desc is a member via CheckDescID (I think GetParameter would also work and return an empty container when the ID does not exist).
    3. When the ID does not exist, start browsing the container for parameters that are of a DTYPE that implies an underlying node, such as DTYPE_BASELINK.
    4. When you find such parameter, get the node node, and check there.
    5. Rinse and repeat recursively.

    Issues:

    1. You cannot distinguish the case where an object A has two BaseLink parameters which both hold an object of type T, but not the same instances.
    2. You will run into issues with DescID translations which some nodes might do. This is a really big point, which is probably already overlooked in your current code.
    3. Nested node relations can get REALLY complicated. BaseLink is trivial, but stuff like field lists, volume lists, or some special shader stuff can get really complicated. You would probably only have to worry about base links and field lists in your case, as other renderers are irrelevant for you, but field list alone are already complex enough that I would strongly advise against 'just implementing it'.
  • Maxon Cinema 4D 2026.3 SDK Release

    Dear development community,

    On June the 10th, 2026, Maxon Computer released Cinema 4D 2026.3. For an overview of the new features please refer to the end user release notes.

    Alongside this release, existing APIs have been updated. For a detailed overview, please see the Cinema 4D C++ SDK change notes.

    Cinema 4D

    C++ API

    • Added ARM64 support for Windows.
    • Added support for Xcode 26 as a build platform on macOS.

    Python API

    • No changes

    Happy rendering and coding,
    the Maxon SDK Team

    ℹ Cloudflare unfortunately still does interfere with our server cache. You might have to refresh your cache manually to see new data when you read this posting within 24 hours of its release.