cycle
-
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 07/04/2005 at 16:17, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Have you checked to see what messages are sent with a change of the cycle box value? This will give you an idea of what to look for.
-
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 10/04/2005 at 13:29, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Robert is right; look at what's sent to Message() when the cycle field is changed. (Assuming it's in a dialog box, not in the attributes manager.)
-
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 11/04/2005 at 01:54, xxxxxxxx wrote:
It is in the attributes manager.
I detect the change now by reading the value in the next execute pass (tag plug).
But i woul like to trap it on the moment its selected. -
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 11/04/2005 at 04:28, xxxxxxxx wrote:
when you change any description entry, I am sure the Message MSG_DESCRIPTION_VALIDATE is definetly called (when you are in the AM). So check for it in your Message function and do whatever you want.
HTH
KatachiP.S.: A "thanks" isn´t too hard...
-
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 11/04/2005 at 10:45, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Oh, of course, yes..., thanks..i'm sorry.
And: indeed, the VALIDATE message is the one, great, thanks again. -
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 06/07/2008 at 09:37, xxxxxxxx wrote:
That's great, but how am I able to see which one is changed? Do I have to control it manually or is there something else?
-
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 06/07/2008 at 12:57, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi,
Not sure if i remember well but i think it was something like this....
>
\> Bool YOURCLASS::Message(GeListNode \*node, LONG type, void \*data) \> { \> DescriptionCommand \*dc = (DescriptionCommand\* ) data; \> \> switch (type) \> { \> \> case (MSG_DESCRIPTION_VALIDATE) : \> { \> if (dc->id[0].id == YOUR_ID) \> { \> // do what you need to do \> break; \> } \> } \>
Succes!
Jan -
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 07/07/2008 at 09:21, xxxxxxxx wrote:
By that I always get the id 0. I think it's only for buttons. Isn't it DescriptionValidate instead of DescriptionCommand in this case?
-
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 08/07/2008 at 00:54, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Hm,
I'm using it exactly like this, you must have a problem elswhere?
Jan
-
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 09/07/2008 at 15:59, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Maybe, but I have no idea where. I gave every single element a unique long value in the *.h-file. As I said, the buttons work fine this way, but not the other things. This is my code:
> `
\> Bool x::Message(GeListNode *node, LONG type, void *t_data) \> { \> switch (type) \> { \> case MSG_DESCRIPTION_COMMAND: \> { \> DescriptionCommand *dc = (DescriptionCommand* ) t_data; \> \> if (dc->id[0].id==REFRESH) \> { \> ... \> } \> if (dc->id[0].id==NEUE_ZUFALLSWERTE) \> { \> ... \> \> } \> } \> case MSG_DESCRIPTION_VALIDATE: \> { \> DescriptionCommand *dc = (DescriptionCommand* ) t_data; \> GePrint(LongToString(dc->id[0].id)); \> \> } \> } \> return true; \> } \>
`
-
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 09/07/2008 at 16:08, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Duh. MSG_DESCRIPTION_COMMAND has a DescriptionCommand in the t_data but MSG_DESCRIPTION_VALIDATE has a DescriptionValidate in t_data. Unfortunately, DescriptionValidate does NOT contain the Description ID of the command that triggered the message so you have to be general about it here (i.e.: check every description that falls under validation).
Don't ask me, ask Maxon.