@m_magalhaes Thanks, hope to fix it in a future release.

hi, yes closed is a better word in that case, I still need to add something in the documentation. Cheers, Manuel

@s_bach Thank you. Works as expected.

hello, if you have nothing to add, this thread will be considered as 'solved' and will be closed tomorrow Cheers Manuel

RE: appears they need a little bit more love. Thanks for the clarification. The code works as expected!

Thanks for reporting I've created a bug report. Cheers, Maxime

@s_bach Thank you!

@s_bach Thank you! Works as expected.

@s_bach RE: The dialog box is not opened when you load the document. The dialog box is opened when you try to save it using CallCommand(). Thanks for the clarification. The code you presented works as expected. Thank you!

Gotcha. Thanks for the reminder!

This issue is now fixed in R21. Cheers, Maxime.

Thanks for the reply, it really helped me out. John

@m_adam Gotcha. Thanks for the confirmation.

@m_adam I have a handful of doc.SearchObject() so I was looking for an easier route. I guess there is no way around it except concatenating strings. Anyhow, thanks for the code and confirmation. Will tag this thread as closed. Have a great day ahead!

hello, just a step to confirm @C4DS answer and if you look again at @r_gigante answer in this post it will make now fully sense. regarding your code i will go like this just to be a bit shorter and easier if i want to add or remove a tag from the list. safeTagList = [5617, 5600, 1604] tags = node.GetTags() for tag in tags: if tag not in safeTagList: tag.Remove() Cheers Manuel

@m_magalhaes Oh yeah I forgot to add the tags. I'm using Python by the way. You can count this post as solved.

Thanks for the @r_gigante response. I'll stay away from the non-official method. Is this the reason why COPYFLAGS::PRIVATE_NO_TAGS is not included in the Python documentation of the GetClone() method? I'll use the clone everything then remove tags methodology instead.

Works perfectly. Thanks!

@pim said in Current State to Object of a Subdivision Surface: SendModelingCommand Oops, I see Subdivision Renderer setting and not Subdivision Editor setting is taken into account.

Hi @pim only UNDOTYPE_NEW is needed. Moreover, I would like to mention that SendModelingCommand offers the MODELINGCOMMANDFLAGS_CREATEUNDO flags in order to automatically creates undo. Cheers, Maxime.